In the Harvard Business Review article, “The New Reality:
Constant Disruption” (Hagel III, Brown, & Davison,
2009) , the authors examine
how the historical path of disruption followed by stabilization has gone the
way of the paper airline ticket. Today businesses face situations where core
technologies and computing never stabilize. The viability of products, and
even their business cases, is being questioned before the products are launched
into the market. The article makes the
case that “because the underlying
technologies don't stabilize, the social and business practices that coalesce
into our new digital infrastructure aren't stabilizing either. Businesses and,
more broadly, social, educational, and economic institutions, are left racing
to catch up with the steadily improving performance of the foundational
technologies.” If the equilibrium has been forever altered, then existing
managerial styles and institutional practices must evolve at the same speed in
order to keep up. Even the most mature organizations,
e.g., those with certified ITIL, CMMi, and ISO credentials will struggle to stay
ahead. Factor the new norm into enterprises in which key departments are
organizationally, geographically, and even culturally divided, then the need for
interdepartmental groups to operate more effectively is magnified
significantly. Having robust business
capabilities independently is not good enough to remain competitive. Rather differentiation is achieved through
the effective interactions of these business capabilities along the value
chain.
A logical counter measure to the disruption is to mobilize
resources and develop supporting processes in order to bring organizations
closer and bridge the gaps that divide. This frequently involves embedding key
individuals or teams within other organizations, cross-functional training,
tools, and better visibility into existing business processes in order to better
position an enterprise to meet the challenge of the new speed of business.
Agility determines at what level the business will lead or lag in the
marketplace.
“These
complex relationships are only exacerbated by dynamic geographic and
cross-channel coordination requirements, and multiple products and customer
accounts. No industry is immune from these challenges. Companies that want to
deliver the best experience to their stakeholders need to provide a complete
picture of all parties in the relationship at the point of service. The ability
to do this requires that organizations have a complete understanding of the
complicated hierarchies and relationships that exist between them and their
stakeholders.” (Moseley, 2013)
Definition
The Wikipedia definition for business relationship
management is, “A formal approach to
understanding, defining, and supporting a broad spectrum of inter-business
activities related to providing and consuming knowledge and services.” (Wikipedia,
2009)
More practically, the position is designed to develop a productive and
professional relationship between Technology and internal IT customers.
Business Relationship Management (BRM) identifies internal IT customer needs
and ensures the service provider is able to meet these needs with an appropriate
catalog of services. BRM is both an organizational role and a competency that has
been formalized in IT service management discipline by multiple standards
organizations, including the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL®) and the ISO/IEC
20000 standard for IT Service Management. BRM was added to ITIL 2011 as a
Service Strategy process; whereby the purpose of BRM, as stated in the ITIL
Service Strategy book, is “to provide the
link between the service provider and customers at the strategic and tactical
levels.” It is through BRM that the IT organization develops an
understanding of the needs of the business and how IT organization communicates
value of services to the business (Salo, 2014) . The focus at many
enterprises is to embed the BRM role closer to the business unit in order for
Technology to become a pro-active driver of business strategy and change in a
partnership with the business. The position will build and maintain “trusted
advisor” technical relationships with senior business and IT executives (CIO’s,
CTO’s, and VP’s.). The relationship manager will work with both business and IT
peers through an ongoing BRM lifecycle that involves iterative process to aggregate
demand for IT services, represents the resources requested — and their costs —
to the business, and helps optimize the deployment of IT resources over time.
Bridging the GapsAs suggested in the HBR article on constant disruption, enterprises are constantly evolving and when technology is the driver it happens at an accelerated pace. The introduction of a BRM function to bridge gaps and bring stability between organizations means the BRM function must be adaptable and evolve as well. In the Gartner report on “Relationship Management: Making it Work”
Best Practices
Those organizations adopting BRM as a formal discipline
within their company have found a discrete set of characteristics of the
function that when applied contribute to a successful implementation. The
following BRM Best Practices were
highlighted in the 2001 Gartner article on BRM.
-
Select individuals with the right experience and mix of skills
- Create dual reporting relationships
- Establish credibility with executive sponsorship
- Place relationship managers on the senior leadership team they support
- Demonstrate the value and business alignment of IT
- Develop the role of relationship manager to make it aspirational
- Make relationship management part of the executive career path
Organizations adopting these best practices have discovered their
BRM function, and specifically the relationship managers, are able to move further
up the trust curve and increase their value and contribution to the enterprise.
Successful BRM implementations generally result from relationship managers who are
better able to integrate into the environment and move comfortably between the
commercial and technical organizations.
The Relationship Manager is often an experienced senior IT
professional who brings a broad background in various areas of product,
systems integration, operations, and application development. These individuals are mature IT professionals
and are from the onset capable of leading strategy and problem solving of IT activities,
but the key aspect is they bring a new perspective. Their knowledge base and
close proximity to the internal customers allows them to be proactive and
influential IT advocate.
Career Path
Experienced relationship
managers typically have a background with both IT and business acumen, many of
which become influential leaders and senior executives within the enterprise.
BRM is trending to become a career advancement job that provides diverse hands-on
training and positions the relationship manager well for senior executive roles.
Per Gartner, “Some enterprises require
individuals looking to progress to senior roles with the IT organization to do
a stint as a relationship manager, and many relationship manager do go on to
become CIOs or key players in the business unit.”
As the BRM department head is
sometimes designed to be a rotational assignment, consideration must be given
to ensuring there is a seamless transition between assignments and meaningful opportunities
for the new managers to come up to speed at a reasonable pace. One way to facilitate the transition between
assignments is to lay the groundwork for a common foundation around BRM and the
expectations of the function. Having standardized training and a certification
process as a requisite of the job will contribute significantly toward
providing a solid foundation regarding the position. Consider that ITIL now
embraces BRM and the recognition and credibility of the position increases
substantially.
The Business Relationship
Management Institute (BRMI, 2013) is a leading
professional development organization that serves the BRM professional
community and corporations. BRMI was incorporated as a 501(c)(6) corporation in
March, 2013 and it provides quality education, training, and certification
programs for both aspiring and seasoned relationship mangers. Developed by
expert BRM practitioners and trainers, BRMI offers professional certification,
which is similar in concept to the Project Management Professional (PMP)
certification sanctioned by the Project Management Institute. According to BRMI,
holders of the Business Relationship Management Professional™ (BRMP™)
credentials are able to demonstrate:
· Understanding of
the characteristics of the BRM role.
· Understanding of
what it means to perform as a trusted advisor, contributing to business
strategy formulation and shaping business demand for the provider’s services.
· Understanding of how
Portfolio Management disciplines and techniques are used to maximize realized
business value.
· Understanding of
Organizational Change Management and the conditions for successful change
programs.
· Understanding of
their role in Service Management, as defined by ITIL, and how to align services
and service levels with business needs.
· Ability to
communicate effectively and persuasively.
Engagement Guidelines
Often the BRM team is by design as a small organization with
limited resources, which can easily become over extended when engaged for
improper reasons. To maximize its contribution to the enterprise, BRM should be
involved in planning exercises that are strategic in nature, such as annual
budget planning and prioritization, and it will be less involved in ‘blocking
& tackling’ exercises. On the other hand, the group will engage in the most
significant problem solving activity, such as when an issue impacts a product
over a long period of time or an entire portfolio is at risk do a single
instance. Figure
2
serves as a high level guideline on when BRM should be engaged relative to
problem solving and planning activities.
Caution Indicators
A key challenge in developing the BRM function will be to
ensure that it provides significant value to the enterprise, while at the same
time it should avoid disrupting existing business functions that are working as
required. It will take extensive coordination, communication, and sponsorship
at the ‘C’ level in order to introduce a new layer of management between
critical organizations that does not become counterproductive. Signs to look
for when BRM is off target:
Figure
3 If BRM is ineffective in its relationship
with IT customers and it merely becomes a bureaucratic layer added to the
existing relationship, then customers will naturally bypass BRM altogether and
go directly to the source.
Figure
4 If the BRM function only serves as a
‘funnel’ to channel problems into Technology, then they will just ignore BRM
and become non-responsive.
These scenarios are in line with Gartner’s explanation of
why many BRM implementations fail.
Gartner indicates that either the relationship manager is unable to win
the respect of the business unit or in other cases the relationship manager is
unable to progress adequately beyond the most basic tasks (e.g., Level 1)
associated with the roles. To properly monitor the progress and effectiveness
of BRM there should be periodic assessments in order to gauge if it is
achieving the established objectives. Monitoring will involve both performance
and customer satisfaction surveys given to key stakeholders that are affiliated
with BRM.
Goals & Objective
BRM is a crucial role that bridges a service provider and
the business that depends upon that provider’s services. The most common BRM function
supports an Information Technology (IT) organization, but BRMs can also serve
Human Resources, Finance, Legal, Facilities and other shared services
functions. (BRMI, 2013)
The following list contains high-level objectives based on best practices.
- Improve communication and advanced information sharing
- Proactive demand-capacity planning
- Improved transparency in decision making
- More efficient and effective prioritization
- Stimulates, surfaces, and shapes business demand for a provider’s products and services and ensures that the potential business value from those products and services is captured, optimized and recognized
- Resists order taking, striving to be a valued strategic partner with their business customers and with the organizations that supply services
- Is a valued member of both the business and the supply organization’s leadership teams.
- Seamlessly handles many roles and brokers capabilities to help translate business demand into services and business solutions
- Is passionate about lifelong learning and proud to demonstrate an unwavering commitment to excellence through professional training and certification
Establishing BRM is as often said more of a journey than a
final destination. This is particularly
relevant in light of what businesses are experiencing regarding the new speed
of business. In fact what might be
considered a final destination is almost impossible to define, since as soon as
plans are printed they become outdated.
However, for those items that are generally known, such as company
vision, commercial and market goals, and the IT strategy, then with these key
objectives in mind the Relationship Manager understands he or she must:
-
Earn the trust of internal customers and stakeholders
- Understand the business needs
- Be knowledgeable in technical capabilities
The objectives for establishing BRM are ultimately to position a liaison between two divisions, whereby the liaison will function in an advisory role facilitating critical demand and capacity planning while progressing along the trust curve to become an advocate for Technology’s capabilities and services. Just as the technical landscape is changing underneath our feet, the BRM position must be flexible and evolving to keep up with the dynamics defining today’s business environment. The full potential of the BRM function may not be entirely recognized until all the supporting processes and training are adequately established. If implemented properly, BRM can become a key contributor to Technology’s overall success and a key part in the career development of technology leaders.
BRMI. (2013). About BRMI. Retrieved 08 28,
2013, from Business Relationship Management Institute:
http://brminstitute.org/about/
Dallas, S., & Gomolski, B. (2001). Relationship
Management: Making It Work. Gartner, 4.
Hagel III, J., Brown, J. S., & Davison, L. (2009,
Jan. 17). The New Reality: Constant Disruption. (H. B. Review,
Producer) Retrieved Aug. 21, 2013, from HBR Blog Network:
lhttp://blogs.hbr.org/bigshift/2009/01/the-new-reality-constant-disru.html
Landry, S., & Lapkin, A. (2009). The Re-Emergence
of the Business Relationship Manager. Gartner, 1-7.
Moseley, M. (2013, 08 05). Technology as the
Relationship Doctor for Business: Understanding Business Relationships Within
an Organizational Hierarchy Framework. Retrieved 08 05, 2013, from ISACA:
http://www.isaca.org/Journal/Past-Issues/2007/Volume-6/Pages/Technology-as-the-Relationship-Doctor-for-Business-Understanding-Business-Relationships-Within-an-Or1.aspx
Salo, T. (2014, Feb). ITIL®’s BRM: How Business
Relationship Management Shows the Love. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from
G2G3: http://americas.g2g3.com/blog/bid/99697/ITIL-s-BRM-How-Business-Relationship-Management-Shows-the-Love
Wikipedia. (2009). Business relationship
management. Retrieved Aug. 27, 2013, from Wikipedia.org:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_relationship_management
No comments:
Post a Comment